No Pathway and No Survivors: Why We Need to Reframe the Dementia Dismissal
- Sharon Daltrey
- Oct 11
- 2 min read
I was watching The Weakest Link on catchup last night and the catchphrase suddenly caught me off guard. “You are the weakest link. Goodbye.” It’s entertaining in a game show. But the same message is often delivered—quietly, systemically—to those experiencing a dementia diagnosis.
The actual words might not be the same, but the message is. The world often responds with quiet retreat. Services thin out. Conversations shift. Invitations stop arriving. It’s not just a medical label—it’s a social signal. A slow, unspoken dismissal from the human race.
Unlike other conditions, dementia offers no narrative of survivorship. There’s no “beating it,” no triumphant return. And without that arc, society struggles to stay present. People living with dementia, and their carers, are often left to their own devices—unsupported, unacknowledged, and emotionally abandoned.
This absence of pathway is not a logistical oversight. It’s a cultural failure. We’ve built systems that manage decline but rarely honour presence. We’ve normalised the idea that once cognitive clarity fades, so does personhood—and this is profoundly harmful. It’s the kind of cultural blind spot that quietly excludes millions of people worldwide from full participation in the human story.
Of course, there are care professionals who resist this pattern—who stay, who witness, who honour presence even when systems don’t. Their work is often invisible, under-supported, and emotionally demanding. But it matters. And it deserves amplification.
People do survive the dismissal. They survive the silence. They survive the systems that forgot how to stay with them. And they often do so with grace, humour, frustration, and love—often in spite of the structures around them. But when they respond with anger or distress, they’re too often labelled as difficult and medicated into quietness.
Reframing dementia care means refusing to participate in that exile. It means designing for engagement, not containment. It means building emotional scaffolding that says: You are still here. You are still worthy. You are still human.
This is the work I’ve committed to through Timeless Presents and the Timeless Integrated Care System. It’s not about softening the truth—it’s about refusing to abandon it. Because dignity doesn’t depend on memory. And presence doesn’t require performance.








Comments